ILLINOIS LEGAL NEWS & VIDEOS

Stay updated with the latest Illinois legal news and insights. Explore our collection of videos for in-depth analysis and commentary.

Chicago Criminal Attorney John Heiderscheidt Comments on the Likelihood of Jail for Trump after Judge Merchan Finds Him in Contempt

Judge Merchan who is presiding over the Trump Hush Money Trial found former President Donald Trump in contempt for violating the Court’s gag order in the case. Trump’s lawyers have argued the gag order is Constitutionally impermissible. For the first time, on record, Judge Merchan warned the former President that jail could be a consequence of continued willful violations of the gag order.

The violations of the gag order center around social media tweets the President has made about potential witnesses and, at times, court personnel. “This highlights a situation where the client doesn’t want to follow the rules a Court puts in place for trial,” said Chicago Criminal and Immigration Attorney John Heiderscheidt.

“Because this situation hasn’t happened before, we really don’t have much in the way of binding precedent to help the Court figure out how to handle the situation. Although jail has been mentioned by the Court, it seems an extraordinary step. I doubt the Court would do more than something symbolic, like a temporary hold in a courthouse cell for a few hours. But even a symbolic hold would be enormously impactful from a political and precedential perspective.”  

Chicago Criminal Attorney Questions the Helpfulness of McDougal Evidence in Hush Money Trial

Today David Pecker testified to the jury regarding former Playboy model Karen McDougal. Mr. Pecker described buying Ms. McDougal’s story for $150,000 and disguising the payment as a deal for other services, effectively concealing what may have been an illegal donation to Mr. Trump’s campaign. Under questioning from prosecutors, Mr. Pecker acknowledged that this type of arrangement — in which a corporation was spending money to influence the election — was unlawful.

“Pecker’s testimony gives jurors an alternate theory for why Trump participated in a “catch and kill” transaction – for personal rather than campaign benefit. It is also unclear how the law will support a conviction where the alleged underlying conduct  complained of is not criminal in nature,” said John Heiderscheidt.

Chicago Criminal Attorney John Heiderscheidt Comments on Opening Statements in Trump Hush Money Trial

The opening statements for the trial concerning former President Donald Trump and the 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels have begun. 

The State spoke for almost ten minutes longer than the Defense. At issue in the case is whether Trump’s payments to Stormy Daniels through Lawyer Michael Cohen were legal expenses or unlawful campaign contributions. The Southern District of New York declined to prosecute this case while Trump was President, though CNN legal analysts offered opinions qualifying why that may have been. 

One major question to be answered is whether Trump will testify. The Judge made preliminary evidentiary rulings that will help the State’s cross examination of Trump should he testify in his own defense. Trump predictably blasted the motives of the prosecutor and decried the underpinnings of the case as a hoax. 

“I don’t envy the position Trump’s lawyers face,” said John Heiderscheidt, a Chicago Criminal Attorney. “At heart this will come down to the jury’s analysis of intent. Do you put him on and risk all the negatives from the civil rape and fraud cases on cross? Or do you just say they can’t make their burden because Michael Cohen is a liar and hope the jury overlooks his non-testimony? It is a very close strategy call, made more difficult by the prejudicial material the Judge would admit on cross examination.” 

The State’s first witness took the stand for approximately 30 minutes, but testimony was cut short due to an alternate juror’s dental appointment. The parties expect trial to last several weeks. 

Migrant Evictions in Chicago

Chicago has recently been grappling with the eviction of migrants from city and state-operated shelters. These are just the latest challenges migrants are facing. This situation raises serious questions about the future of these individuals and the city’s capacity to handle this crisis.

In an attempt to control the influx of migrants, City officials introduced a policy limiting shelter stays to 60 days. After this period, migrants are required to find other housing or apply for another shelter at the city’s “landing zone” for new arrivals. This policy was enforced after several delays, including bad weather and staffing issues, and the city began evicting migrants from shelters in March. Officials estimate that 2,026 migrants will be evicted from shelters by the end of April.

Migrants have been coming to Chicago since August 2022 as part of a busing strategy initiated by Texas Governor Greg Abbott. Chicago, along with New York City and Denver, has struggled to meet the demand for housing and social services due to the influx of migrants.

The migrant shelter evictions in Chicago highlight the complexities of managing migration in urban areas. While the city struggles with this issue, the migrants who came in search of a better life now face an uncertain future in the city they hoped to call home.

Chicago Immigration Attorney John Heiderscheidt Comments on Migrant Website’s Murky Details Surrounding $300 Million Funding

Although the City of Chicago has a website dedicated to monitoring how nearly $300 million is being spent on the migrant crisis, it seems as though details are still murky as to how the city is spending that money. The details of how the money is being spent remain a mystery due to how the city is handling the migrant crisis. The City of Chicago has outsourced a majority of operations and staffing to private companies.

Favorite Healthcare Staffing, a healthcare staffing agency based in Kansas, has been paid more than $206 million. Equitable Social Solutions, a Kentucky-based organization that partners with cities such as Chicago to help locate housing for migrants, was paid $45 million.

Missing from the website, which was put together by Mayor Johnson’s administration, are details regarding how much profit these companies are making. Documents like leasing contracts and how much developers and building owners are making off of allowing the city to convert their buildings into shelters are noticeably absent from the website.

Attorney Heiderscheidt included his thoughts on the situation saying, “The City has badly handled this crisis and it should be turned over to federal authorities, as the law requires.”

Chicago Criminal and Immigration Attorney Comments on DHS Involvement in Trafficking Allegations Tied to Sean “Diddy” Combs

Hip-hop mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has been under fire for accusations of sexual abuse, trafficking, and rape. Federal agents have searched two of Combs’ properties. The searches are part of an ongoing investigation by federal authorities in New York. The Department of Homeland Security has been involved in recent searches of his New York, Los Angeles, and Miami properties.

DHS works to prevent and respond to terrorist attacks within the United States. This involves coordinating efforts across various federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial agencies. The department is responsible for securing the borders of the United States, including the prevention of illegal immigration and the interdiction of illicit goods and activities. DHS oversees immigration enforcement and services, including the enforcement of immigration laws, immigration benefits, and refugee resettlement programs. That being said, the Department of Homeland Security’s involvement in this case can only mean that somehow immigrants were involved in Combs’ operation.

John Heiderscheidt, an immigration attorney who has extensive knowledge concerning DHS, said, “The fact that DHS is involved might suggest migrants were used or involved in whatever alleged trafficking operation took place.” Mr. Heiderscheidt has practiced criminal and immigration law in Illinois since 2011, representing clients successfully through bench and jury trials.

Chicago Civil Attorney John Heiderscheidt Comments on Trump’s Bond Predicament

Chicago Civil Attorney John Heiderscheidt Comments on Trump's Bond Predicament

In February, Justice Arthur Engoron ruled against Donald Trump, imposing a penalty of over $350 million due to a year-long scheme to inflate his financial statements. This penalty increased to over $464 million with interest. Trump must post the entire $464 million bond by Monday, March 25.

As for the appeal, Trump has expressed his intention to challenge the judgment. However, under New York law, he must first pay the entire fine or secure a bond. His legal team have stated that despite their efforts, it has been nearly impossible to find a company willing to act as a guarantor for the full sum. Trump claimed to have secured nearly enough funds for collateral, but it remains to be seen whether he can meet the requirements.

This situation has led to speculation about Trump’s financial stability. Much of his fortune remains tied up in real estate and other assets. The outcome of this situation is still uncertain and will likely depend on the decisions of the courts and the success of Trump’s appeal.

As an experienced attorney, John Heiderscheidt says, “It is rare that a litigant in a civil case is required to post this much money to pursue an appeal, but until an appellate court steps in, Trump has few options but compliance.”

ABOUT SUBSCRIPTION LAWYER

What Our Clients Are Saying...

WE MAKE IT EASY

How It Works

STEP 1

​Make your initial deposit of

ONLY $500

and become a Subscription Lawyer client. Contact us to sign up!

STEP 2

Receive Benefits:

STEP 3

​Receive discounts on select legal services, sometimes up to 50%!

News / Videos

Have Questions? We are here to help!

Ready to Sign Up? Contact Us!

Subscription Lawyer Logo

FOLLOW US

Scroll to Top